Skip to content
Na h-Eileanan Siar Counts — Na h-Eileanan Siar, in numbers.Local help →

Na h-Eileanan Siar, in numbers

Action plan

Na h-Eileanan Siar council area. Every figure carries its own date.

Practical proposed steps for Na h-Eileanan Siar.

The stages explain what should happen first. They are not promised completion dates. Funding, powers and ongoing costs need to be established before a proposal is adopted.

  1. Build on experience of bringing homes back into use
  2. Show which island roads will improve
  3. Design the campus around island access needs
  4. Keep conditional campus funding visible
  5. Make room for homes people can afford
  6. Plan homes and care around an older population
  7. Connect local skills to local opportunities
  8. Target safety work where problems repeat
  9. Turn published plans into visible progress

Proposal

Build on experience of bringing homes back into use

The council reports previous delivery through its Empty Homes Project.

Reusing existing homes can support settlements beyond the main town.

Evidence

Who could lead: Comhairle nan Eilean Siar.

  1. Start now

    Explain how owners can discuss reuse options.

  2. Over the next few years

    Prioritise homes near services and local employment.

  3. Over the longer term

    Track sustained occupation by island area.

How to judge progress

Starting point: Historic delivery described in the draft housing strategy.

Measure: Do not count a repaired property as occupied without confirmation.

Trade-off: Repairs can be expensive and ownership issues can take time.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Outer Hebrides Empty Homes Project →

Proposal

Show which island roads will improve

The Uist and Barra programme identifies road investment, not a completed network upgrade.

Residents need to know which routes and journeys are affected.

Evidence

Who could lead: Comhairle nan Eilean Siar.

  1. Start now

    Publish the named road schemes and current condition.

  2. Over the next few years

    Coordinate works with lifeline transport and local access.

  3. Over the longer term

    Review repair durability and journey reliability.

How to judge progress

Starting point: Council regeneration update.

Measure: Report completed sections and remaining work.

Trade-off: Island works depend on materials, weather and transport.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Uist and Barra roads investment →

Proposal

Design the campus around island access needs

Barra and Vatersay’s campus is supported in principle, subject to conditions.

Shared facilities could reduce fragmented journeys between services.

Evidence

Who could lead: Comhairle nan Eilean Siar.

  1. Start now

    Publish the services, access design and remaining approvals.

  2. Over the next few years

    Test the operating model with island residents and service partners.

  3. Over the longer term

    Review availability and travel needs after opening.

How to judge progress

Starting point: March 2026 governance report.

Measure: Separate business-case approval from construction and opening.

Trade-off: Shared facilities still require sustainable staffing.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Barra and Vatersay Community Campus →

Proposal

Keep conditional campus funding visible

The campus report makes funding subject to budgetary and business-case conditions.

The announcement is not an unconditional construction guarantee.

Evidence

Who could lead: Comhairle nan Eilean Siar.

  1. Start now

    List the outstanding conditions and decision dates.

  2. Over the next few years

    Phase commitments around secured funding.

  3. Over the longer term

    Review the service plan if costs or scope change.

How to judge progress

Starting point: March 2026 report.

Measure: Publish changes to the approved scope.

Trade-off: Phasing can delay some services while protecting affordability.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Barra and Vatersay Community Campus →

Proposal

Make room for homes people can afford

The average home price is £140,000 (July 2026) in Na h-Eileanan Siar council area. This is about £57,000 lower than the Scotland average for the same month.

Housing costs matter most alongside earnings and the number of affordable homes available. A local average cannot tell us whether a particular household can afford its home.

Who could lead: The housing and planning authorities, housing associations and developers.

  1. Start now

    Publish the local waiting list, temporary accommodation and affordable-home delivery figures together.

  2. Over the next few years

    Test proposed housing sites against affordable-home need, access to work, school places and water capacity.

  3. Over the longer term

    Check whether completed homes reduce unmet need, rather than counting planning permissions as delivery.

How to judge progress

Starting point: The average home price is £140,000 (July 2026) in Na h-Eileanan Siar council area.

Measure: Affordable homes completed, households waiting, time in temporary accommodation, and rent compared with local earnings.

Trade-off: More homes can put pressure on infrastructure and land. Affordability requirements also affect development viability.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Evidence: Average home price →

Outer Hebrides Empty Homes Project →

Proposal

Plan homes and care around an older population

26.5% of people in Na h-Eileanan Siar council area were aged 65 or over (20 March 2022). People aged 65 or over ranged from 21.4% in Steòrnabhagh a Tuath to 32.8% in Na Hearadh — a gap of 11.4 percentage points.

Age alone does not mean poor health or a need for care. Accessible homes, reliable transport and support close to home matter as people get older.

Who could lead: Adult social care, local health services, housing providers and transport authorities.

  1. Start now

    Compare the location of older residents with access to care, shops and transport. Start by checking the different needs in Na Hearadh and Steòrnabhagh a Tuath; census differences are not proof of unmet demand.

  2. Over the next few years

    Prioritise home adaptations and care capacity in places with the clearest unmet need.

  3. Over the longer term

    Build accessible homes and joined-up care into local development plans.

How to judge progress

Starting point: 26.5% aged 65 or over; 20 March 2022. People aged 65 or over ranged from 21.4% in Steòrnabhagh a Tuath to 32.8% in Na Hearadh — a gap of 11.4 percentage points. 20 March 2022; 11 of 11 current wards have comparable figures.

Measure: Waits for home adaptations and care, avoidable hospital stays, and accessible homes delivered.

Trade-off: Services need skilled staff and ongoing funding. Age profiles alone cannot measure unmet care need.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Evidence: People aged 65 or over →

Proposal

Connect local skills to local opportunities

31.2% of people aged 16 or over had a degree or higher (20 March 2022) in Na h-Eileanan Siar council area. People aged 16+ with no qualifications ranged from 13.7% in Loch a Tuath to 19.7% in An Taobh Siar agus Nis — a gap of 6.1 percentage points.

Qualifications show one part of the skills available locally. They do not show whether people have secure jobs or work that uses those skills.

Who could lead: Employers, colleges, universities and the relevant skills authority.

  1. Start now

    Compare vacancies and employer needs with training available to local residents. Start by checking the different needs in An Taobh Siar agus Nis and Loch a Tuath; census differences are not proof of unmet demand.

  2. Over the next few years

    Link training to real jobs, including routes for people without formal qualifications.

  3. Over the longer term

    Track sustained employment and earnings after training, not just course starts.

How to judge progress

Starting point: 31.2% with a degree or higher; 20 March 2022. People aged 16+ with no qualifications ranged from 13.7% in Loch a Tuath to 19.7% in An Taobh Siar agus Nis — a gap of 6.1 percentage points. 20 March 2022; 11 of 11 current wards have comparable figures.

Measure: Sustained jobs, earnings and training completion for residents who face barriers to work.

Trade-off: Training takes time and cannot create demand for jobs on its own. Qualifications are not a complete measure of ability.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Evidence: People aged 16+ with a degree or higher →

Evidence: People aged 16+ with no qualifications →

Stornoway and Lewis Pride in Place →

Proposal

Target safety work where problems repeat

Recorded-crime figures cover the whole Na h-Eileanan Siar council area; they do not identify individual wards.

These are police-recorded crimes under Scottish counting rules. They cannot be ranked alongside the mapped incidents shown for other UK nations.

Who could lead: The local police force, council community safety team and relevant services.

  1. Start now

    Check recurring places and categories alongside local police priorities and residents’ reports.

  2. Over the next few years

    Test focused prevention and support, with a comparison period agreed before the work starts.

  3. Over the longer term

    Publish whether problems fall, move elsewhere or return, and adjust the response.

How to judge progress

Crime evidence and coverage →

Starting point: Use the dated, complete periods shown in Crime and safety; keep anti-social behaviour separate.

Measure: Comparable recorded incidents, repeat victimisation and residents’ reported experience; never a single crude league table.

Trade-off: More reporting can increase recorded crime. Enforcement and support may work differently for different problems.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Proposal

Turn published plans into visible progress

4 named local projects or plans have official evidence in this collection.

A published plan makes responsibilities and intentions easier to inspect. It does not prove that funding is secured or that promised benefits have arrived.

Who could lead: The named project owners and council scrutiny bodies.

  1. Start now

    Put the scope, owner, funding position and next milestone in one public place.

  2. Over the next few years

    Report delivery against the agreed scope and explain delays or changes.

  3. Over the longer term

    Check the benefits residents actually receive after completion.

How to judge progress

Starting point: The dated stages in Projects; unknown costs and funding remain unknown.

Measure: Milestones met, costs against the approved budget, and measured outcomes after delivery.

Trade-off: Delivery reporting takes staff time, but a launch announcement alone cannot show value for money.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Outer Hebrides Empty Homes Project →

Barra and Vatersay Community Campus →

Uist and Barra roads investment →

Stornoway and Lewis Pride in Place →

From evidence to delivery